Greetings, dear people…on this day after the 4th.
We have a house full of grandkids at present. Becki, Andy, and Delaine are at appointments. Thano just got off work…so he’s now at the house with them while I try to get this sent off. I better get back there as soon as I reasonably can to make sure everyone is alive and reasonably well. I hear Bimbo yelling because he wants off his chain to play with the kids.
Have a good rest of your day. Blessings.
Love, Dad/Ray.
God’s judgment should not come with any big surprise. After all, if everything came from Him, if He truly owns everything, if He truly made humans with the special imprint of His image and likeness, and delegated to them some general free-will responsibilities that should guide them into specific relationship with Him, why would He not orchestrate a point where He would call for human accounting? Judgment is well within His rights as Designer, Creator, Sustainer, and Owner.
We have brushed up against this idea before, but for the sake of review, let’s do it again. Most people would not lay claim to being a philosopher or theologian—but they definitely are—in the sense that everyone determines some form of values and purposes in life and formulates some kind of view of God. My own philo-theo (new word) reasoning leads me to recognize that the FOCUS VERSE, properly processed by broader Biblical insight, addresses all three fundamental questions of life—
Please agree with David, even though, like him, we may be flawed in our execution of the ideal. “I will be careful to lead a blameless life” (101:3). The alternative to careful is careless. It only stands to reason that if I face the responsibility of an exacting task and do not perform it carefully, then I am performing carelessly. Basic rules for driving on our roadways require care at staying in your lane at a prescribed range of speed going the same direction as everyone else who drives in that lane. So what happens when a driver, for whatever reason, is not careful to follow the same set of basic rules? More people than himself are put at risk. Why would anyone in their right mind debate this line of reasoning?